Members of the AI and blockchain community have responded to Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin’s concerns about the threats posed by AI. Some agree with Buterin’s views, while others disagree.
– Some agree with Buterin’s thoughts on the potential harm of AI and argue that positive intentions cannot guarantee that AI will not cause harm. They believe that history has shown that positive intentions do not always prevent harm.
– Others express worries about AI’s potential to disfavor defense, decentralization, and democracy. They believe that AI could accelerate the wrong intellectual fields and that human efforts may not be enough to counter it.
– However, some criticize Buterin for having a predefined idea of humanitarian values and argue that these values should come after and with the technology. They believe that understanding both technology and people is important.
– Some members of the community remain neutral and express their willingness to participate in humanity’s collective effort to find answers to the concerns raised by Buterin.
In summary, the AI and blockchain community has shared a range of views on Buterin’s concerns about AI, with some agreeing, some disagreeing, and others remaining neutral.
